Admin and Founder of ‘The Secrets Of The Universe’ and former intern at Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, I am a science student pursuing a Master’s in Physics from India. I love to study and write about Stellar Astrophysics, Relativity & Quantum Mechanics.
Equations possess an amazing ability to convey the beauty of our universe in the form of some symbols and operation. And, one such equation that gives a glimpse of the importance of statistical mechanics in astrophysics is the famous Chandrasekhar limit. So, what does the Chandrasekhar limit actually say? Let’s find out!
Meaning of Chandrasekhar Limit
Formulated by the Indian-American astrophysicist Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, the Chandrasekhar limit defines a limit on the mass of white dwarf stars. It says that if the mass of a white dwarf exceeds 1.4 solar masses (M☉), it will collapse under its own gravity. Thus 1.4M☉ is the maximum mass of a stable white dwarf star.
To arrive at the Chandrasekhar limit, we first need to answer two important questions: How do stars evolve and how does Pauli’s exclusion principle save the star. We begin with the first question:
Read all the articles of the Basics of Astrophysics series here
How do stars evolve?
I will explain it in the simplest and briefest possible way. To read the entire stellar evolution, you can refer to this article of the Basics of Astrophysics series. A star is a hot ball of plasma. There is a core region in the star that hosts a nuclear fusion reaction. A star spends 90% of its life fusing the most basic nuclear fusion reaction: hydrogen to helium in its core. Such a star is known as the main-sequence star, an example is our Sun. The main characteristic of such a star is that it is in perfect hydrostatic equilibrium. Getting complicated?
Consider this: The star is massive. So massive that it starts collapsing under its own gravity. But what stops the inward gravitational collapse is the outward (gas) pressure of the core nuclear reaction. So the inward gravitational collapse is perfectly balanced by the outward gas pressure and such a star is said to be in hydrostatic equilibrium.
- Nuclear reactions in stars
- How do neutron stars and black holes form
- The most important diagram in astrophysics
When all the hydrogen is converted into helium, the next element in the chain, carbon, forms. The temperature required for hydrogen fusion was about 15 million K and for helium fusion to carbon is about 100 million K. One day, again, all the helium burns out into carbon and what is left is an inert carbon core. The temperature required to fuse carbon is whooping 500 million K. Small to mid-sized stars do not have the potential to host a full-scale carbon fusion. That is all we need to know about stellar evolution to understand the Chandrasekhar limit. We now move on to the next question;
How does the Pauli exclusion principle save the star?
Now in the absence of the core reaction, gravity gains the upper hand and starts collapsing the star. This collapse starts increasing the density of the core region. Thus the mean separation between the constituent particles decreases and becomes of the order of de-Broglie wavelength (ignore this wavelength concept if its difficult to understand. Just learn that the density increases and separation b/w particles decreases). Such a system of high density is known as a degenerate system. Now, who will save the star? The answer is electrons! And, this is where Pauli’s exclusion principle comes to action.
Also watch: How will the Sun die?
Electrons, the little sub-atomic particles hate being crushed. They are fermions and obey Pauli’s exclusion principle. Thus no more than two electrons (one with spin up and the other with spin down) can occupy the same quantum state. So as gravity tries to crush the star, all the available lower energy states start getting filled. Now since other electrons cannot occupy the already filled lower energy states, they have to fill the higher energy states.
Lower energy state electrons will say, “No! You cannot occupy this state. We have already occupied it. You need to go to higher energy levels. We will exert an outward pressure if you try to occupy this state.” This pressure is known as electron degeneracy pressure. Thus, in a highly degenerate system, the electrons with the highest energy states have an incredible amount of velocity associated with them (because they are at higher energy levels and hence kinetic energy is high). So high, that now relativistic effects come into the picture.
In a stable white dwarf star, the inward gravitational collapse is balanced by this electron degeneracy pressure. But if the mass of the star becomes more than 1.4 solar masses, even the electron degeneracy pressure will break down. The electrons will then combine with protons and form neutrons and thus, a neutron star. This mass limit, below which the white dwarf star is stable, is known as the Chandrasekhar limit.
The Chandrasekhar limit not only defines a limit for the maximum mass of white dwarfs but also highlights the fact that how much important statistical mechanics is to astrophysics. Although the concept of Chandrasekhar limit is quite simple as compared to a number of complex abstractions in Astrophysics, this threshold is one such important notion that plays a very important role in the life cycle of stars.
[…] white dwarf stars can get while still sustaining such pressure. A limit which is today known as the Chandrasekhar limit. Chandrasekhar’s work was a milestone in the history of black […]
Awesome article….. I actually used to read your article to learn how to write blog and articles… I want to be a blogger also… I also wrote articles on physics and astronomy…. ♥️
Well, this is awesome! These articles really helps me to learn more about physics and astronomy. Thanks for this post.
[…] The concept of Chandrasekhar limit in astrophysics […]
Read with great fascination , your explanation of star collapse .
I’m hoping there’s enough hydrogen in our Sun to last us several thousand years ?
There’s enough to last for another 4-5 billion years 🙂
Wow! How do we know this approximation?
I liked how simply you have explained it sir!!
It’s truely understandable to those readers also who are new to this concept.
Love all your blogs. This one has accurate and precise explanation. Love the work.